<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Found+READ: Stories by Amit Bijlani</title>
    <link>http://startitup.indieword.com/person/8091</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 00:22:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Stories by Amit Bijlani</description>
    <item>
      <title>How do you value a startup without using revenue projections? </title>
      <link>http://startitup.indieword.com/view/question-of-the-day24</link>
      <guid>http://startitup.indieword.com/view/question-of-the-day24</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is a revision of Amit&amp;#8217;s Question from Tues May 8, 2007&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;Every startup wants to believe that they are unique and revolutionary, it is no different in our case. We do have a business model and revenue projections but after reading several articles on startup valuation and listening to Guy Kawasaki, it seems like basing your valuation on revenue projections is not a sound strategy. Investors seem to prefer something more tangible, ie. assets, patented technology, user base, etc. Our competitors are privately-held, so we have no information on their revenue or other metrics to use to build a comparative valuation for our company.&lt;br /&gt;Let me rephrase the question:&lt;br /&gt;What are rules for a startup to build a sound valuation without using revenue projections?&lt;br /&gt;What are the assumptions one should take into account? &lt;br /&gt;When you are approaching angels and have no revenues or patents or other comparative metrics as yet, how do you justify 10% equity with X dollars? Is it OK to just base it on revenue &lt;em&gt;projections&lt;/em&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 00:22:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Amit Bijlani</author>
      <category>Read: Questions</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How do you value a startup without using revenue projections?</title>
      <link>http://startitup.indieword.com/view/question-of-the-day37</link>
      <guid>http://startitup.indieword.com/view/question-of-the-day37</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This is a revision of Amit&amp;#8217;s Question from Tues May 8, 2007&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Every startup wants to believe that they are unique and revolutionary, it is no different in our case. We do have a business model and revenue projections but after reading several articles on startup valuation and listening to Guy Kawasaki, it seems like basing your valuation on revenue projections is not a sound strategy. Investors seem to prefer something more tangible, ie. assets, patented technology, user base, etc. Our competitors are privately-held, so we have no information on their revenue or other metrics to use to build a comparative valuation for our company.&lt;br /&gt;Let me rephrase the question:&lt;br /&gt;What are rules for a startup to build a sound valuation without using revenue projections?&lt;br /&gt;What are the assumptions one should take into account? &lt;br /&gt;When you are approaching angels and have no revenues or patents or other comparative metrics as yet, how do you justify 10% equity with X dollars? Is it OK to just base it on revenue &lt;em&gt;projections&lt;/em&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 16:04:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Amit Bijlani</author>
      <category>Read: Questions</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
