<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Found+READ: Comments by Richard Jones</title>
    <link>http://startitup.indieword.com/person/4099</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 05:49:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Comments by Richard Jones</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Even for the blogosphere this is really weak. This article perfectly illustrates whats wrong with Giga-Om TechCrunch and their ilk. The kind of thin surface level crap that passes for journalism.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Although I liked Broadbandits because of my personal interests, in retrospect, it lacked any real investigative reporting just a simple retelling of the public record. When compared to Conspiracy of Fools it comes up woefully short.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I thought the relaunch of Giga-om would be a serious effort something along the lines of &amp;#8220;The Industry Standard&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;While not perfect, &lt;span class="caps"&gt;TIS&lt;/span&gt; had a very strong reporting staff and provided good back story and reporting on their subjects. I dont know if Web 2.0 is dying or not but I do know what passes for Tech related journalism is not helping matters. A bunch of pithy &amp;#8220;reports&amp;#8221;( passed along from blog to blog) that read like a bad inside joke. I hope you can do better than this.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://startitup.indieword.com/view/aces-dr-dre#content_6134</link>
      <guid>http://startitup.indieword.com/view/aces-dr-dre#content_6134</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 05:49:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Richard Jones</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;While I cannot understand the obsession with celebrity. Both &lt;span class="caps"&gt;TMZ&lt;/span&gt; and TheSmokingGun have excellent staffs, who have developed sources and &amp;#8220;digg&amp;#8221; below the surface not just &amp;#8220;report&amp;#8221; on the latest press release.&lt;br /&gt;That report on &amp;#8221; A Million Pieces&amp;#8221; was outstanding. I suggest Arrington and Malik take that VC ( or in TC&amp;#8217;s case their profits) money and hire Gaspirino or James B. Stewart as contributors&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://startitup.indieword.com/view/aces-dr-dre#content_6138</link>
      <guid>http://startitup.indieword.com/view/aces-dr-dre#content_6138</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 05:50:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Richard Jones</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I hate to beat a dead horse but again this Katie used Dr.Dre and it seems as if google  wikipedia were her sources. This is a start-up blog so here is where the story should have gone:&lt;br /&gt;1. Dre was a young black male could not get traditional funding so his &amp;#8220;angel&amp;#8221; VC was a criminal enterprise (dopeman dopeman)&lt;br /&gt;2. His &amp;#8220;co-founder&amp;#8221;, originally considered the muscle behind the product actually became the the better business person by demanding long term controlof the companies master recording ( a move that on a smaller scale is similar to the many the moves of a young Bill Gates and Microsoft)&lt;br /&gt;3. Egos clash and Dre now has corporate cred and can no get legit funding&amp;#8230;he goes his separate way &lt;br /&gt;4. then he goes Steve Jobs and despite a slow start, a new take on an old idea ( enimen v &amp;#8220;traditional&amp;#8221; rap&amp;#8230;.ipod v old ways of portable entertainment ) he now is on top of his biz&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://startitup.indieword.com/view/aces-dr-dre#content_6148</link>
      <guid>http://startitup.indieword.com/view/aces-dr-dre#content_6148</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 05:50:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Richard Jones</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
